Intake
A short call. We decide together whether Brinvik is the right fit before either of us invests a week. Usually starts on brinvik.com via the agent.
- A clear yes/no on next steps.
- A one-paragraph summary of what we discussed.
A practice of one. A method of five.
A short call. We decide together whether Brinvik is the right fit before either of us invests a week. Usually starts on brinvik.com via the agent.
I map your current workflow, identify the highest-leverage Claude deployment, and produce a written assessment with scope, timeline, and price for the full engagement. Audit fee is credited against any project that follows.
I design the specific Claude deployment: project structure, skills, integrations, data flow, success metrics. Reviewed with you before any building starts.
I build the system, integrate it with your stack (HubSpot, Notion, Slack, Calendly), and validate it against the success metrics from Design.
I train your team, document the system, and turn over admin access. After handoff you can either operate independently or move into a Retainer.
Ongoing optimization, new deployments, monthly review. For teams that have decided Claude is part of how they run. Detailed on the Retainer service page.
See the Retainer →No logos. The tools I use don't make the work better. The work makes the tools earn their keep.
Focus produces depth. Multi-model is the consultant's hedge against having a thesis. Brinvik is a thesis: Claude's reasoning quality and the way it behaves with serious B2B work make it the right model for businesses that want one.
That focus shows up in the work. I know what Claude is good at and what it isn't. I know which integrations matter. The studio doesn't spend half the engagement deciding which model to use. The focus is the moat.
Tell me what you're trying to ship. If Brinvik is the right shop, I'll say so. If not, I'll tell you where to go. Either way, you leave with a plan.