Claude, deployed inside your team.
I audit how your team works, then build the projects, skills, and integrations that remove repetitive work.
The hours you get back
Your team gets 10 to 20 hours a week back from repetitive work: lead qualification, meeting prep, summary writing, drafts, research. I build internal AI tools on Claude that do those jobs inside your existing workflow, so the work still ships and your people stop doing it by hand. Most off-the-shelf AI misses your context or sits outside the tools where the work happens. Claude in the loop does not.
How I work
A five-stage method: Intake, Audit, Design, Deploy, Handoff. The audit is the gating step. I document where Claude removes the most repetitive work before I commit to scope and price. If there's no good fit, I say so. The audit fee is credited against any project that follows, and you keep the written assessment either way.
What's included
- 01Custom Claude projects with shared context
Built around how your team actually works, not a generic template.
- 02Skills tailored to your specific workflows
The repetitive tasks identified in the audit, codified as skills.
- 03Integrations with your existing tools
HubSpot, Notion, Slack, Google Workspace, whatever your stack already runs.
- 04Team training session
A working hour with the team members who will use the system day to day.
- 05Documented playbook for ongoing use
Written down so the system survives turnover and grows with you.
- 0630-day handoff support
After deploy, I'm available to fix what surfaces in the first month of real use.
Timeline
I map how your team works and find where Claude removes the most repetitive work.
The specific Claude system: project structure, skills, integrations, success metrics.
I build, integrate, and validate against the metrics.
Training, documentation, ownership transferred.
When this is right
A fit when
- A team of roughly 5 to 80 people with work that repeats every week.
- Decision-maker is the founder, COO, or head of operations.
- Budget from €7,381 and willing to commit 4–6 hours a week of internal time during the build.
Probably not when
- Pre-revenue or under five knowledge workers. Start with the AI workshop instead.
- Regulated air-gapped environments. Healthcare and defense need different vendors.
- Multi-vendor AI strategies. Brinvik is Claude-only by design.
- Procurement cycles over 60 days.
Is this the right first step for you? Two minutes, an honest answer.
Pick your role and tick what eats your week. The check tells you whether Internal Claude is the first step, or whether another one is.
- 1Your role
- 2What eats your week
- 3The fit, and how I help
Pricing
Internal AI tools are typically Project Core, from €7,381. Larger scopes move to Project Full. The audit (€670, one week) is the first step and is credited against the project fee if you proceed.
Full pricing breakdown →You pick a slot in Kim's calendar. No form, no callback.
FAQ
How do I reduce repetitive work with AI?
Start by finding where the hours actually go: lead qualification, meeting prep, summaries, drafts, research. I audit your team's workflow, then build internal AI tools on Claude that handle those repetitive jobs inside the tools you already use, like HubSpot, Notion, and Slack. Your people keep the judgment; Claude takes the repetitive load.
Only what you choose to put in front of it. We work with your team to define context boundaries up front. Data stays in your systems unless you explicitly route it through.
You own the prompts, the projects, the skills, the playbook, and the integrations. No lock-in. A retainer is available if you want ongoing tuning, but it's opt-in.
An AI engineer builds capacity over months and is then permanent overhead. Brinvik gets you to a working system in 4–6 weeks for a fixed price. If you want a permanent hire afterwards, the playbook gives them a strong starting point.
Adoption is part of the audit. If the team isn't ready, I say so. The audit fee is the cheapest way to find that out, and it's credited against the engagement either way.
Other services
- WorkshopTeach the team to use Claude on the work they already do.→
- Website AgentAn agent at your front door that qualifies, books, or refers.→
- RetainerMonthly tuning once something is live, so it keeps getting better.→
- AdvisoryJudgement on call. Sessions and written decision memos, nothing built.→
- Public speakingA talk about AI with a real system on screen, in Danish or English.→
Fixed price. No surprises.
Read the method →Intake
A short call. We decide together whether Brinvik is the right fit before either of us invests a week.
You leave with a yes or a no, and the price of the next step. If it is a no, you owe nothing and you know where to go instead.
Audit
I map how your team works and where Claude earns its keep. You leave with the plan.
You own the assessment either way: a map of how your team works, where Claude pays off first, and a fixed price you can act on or decline.
Design
Prompts, skills, integrations, and the guardrails around them. Written down.
The whole system on paper before anything is built. Prompts, skills, integrations and guardrails, written so your own team can read them.
Deploy
I ship it. HubSpot, Calendly, Notion, Slack, whatever your stack needs.
A working deployment in your own environment and your own tools, tested against the numbers we agreed in Design.
Handoff
Your team owns the system. I document it, train two operators, and leave the keys. Retainer optional, not assumed.
You get two trained operators, the documentation and the keys. Nothing runs through Brinvik unless you choose the retainer.
Internal AI tools,
scoped in a week.
Tell me what your team does over and over. The audit finds where Claude removes the most repetitive work, with a fixed-price quote you can act on or walk away from.
You pick a slot in Kim's calendar. No form, no callback.
Certified by Anthropic · Fixed price on every stage · Invoiced in DKK