The AI Readiness Check.
The questions change based on what you answer. Five to ten minutes, no email needed to see where you stand. It covers what the EU AI Act actually requires of you today, and where Claude would pay for itself.
Most of what you were told to fear moved. One thing did not.
Read this as text
Most AI compliance advice in 2026 is still selling the 2 August 2026 high-risk deadline. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, the Digital Omnibus, moved that to 2 December 2027 and softened the AI literacy duty in Article 4 at the same time. Article 50, the one about telling people they are dealing with AI, landed on schedule and untouched. So the honest position is narrower and more useful than the panic: less is urgent than you were told, and the part that is urgent is the part nobody is selling.
What applies to you today
Article 50 has applied since 2 August 2026 and the Omnibus left it alone. It is not limited to high-risk systems, so a support assistant or published AI-written copy is enough to be in scope. Training sits here too, for a reason that survives the legal argument: a customer in a security review asks for the records either way.
- Have the people using AI had training that fits their role?
- Could you show a record of who was trained and when?
- Are customers told they are dealing with AI without having to ask?
Whether you are a user or a builder
There is a difference under the AI Act between using somebody else's AI and being treated as its provider, and the obligations are much heavier on the second. Article 25 describes what can move you across that line.
- Are you running chat subscriptions, or have you built AI into your own systems?
- Did you change what the AI was sold to do?
- Does it carry your name rather than the vendor's?
What it would cost you on an ordinary Tuesday
The half no regulator is coming for, and the half that actually bites first: work nobody logged, tools nobody approved, and the question of what happens when a vendor retires the model you depend on.
- Could you list every AI tool in use this week?
- Could you reconstruct an AI-assisted decision from three months ago?
- Where is Claude leaving money on the table right now?
What you get at the end.
Your readiness band and your two worst gaps appear on screen straight away, with no email. If you want the rest, you give an address and get a full report: every gap grouped by when it actually bites, each with the smallest real step to close it, and a source link for anything I claim about the law. Kim reads every one.
Start the check →Why I made this free.
Most consultancies hide their methodology. Brinvik does the opposite. This is the instrument I use during Stage 02. If you can run it yourself and decide Brinvik isn't necessary, that's a good outcome for both of us. If you can't run it, or you do and want help anyway, that's when we talk. One thing it is not: legal advice. I am not a lawyer, and the report says so in the same words.
Five to ten minutes now,
or a surprise later.
Run the check on your own company. If you want a second pair of eyes on what it surfaces, book a call and I'll tell you honestly whether Claude is worth it.
You pick a slot in Kim's calendar. No form, no callback.
Certified by Anthropic · Fixed price on every stage · Invoiced in DKK